Johnson Kong

is the Executive Vice President / Head of Asia Pacific, for IP.com Inc. Johnson Kong has many years of hands-on experience in business. As the Executive Vice President and Head of Asia Pacific of IP.com, he assisted clients in creating and implementing robust innovation management and intellectual property strategies to support business goals. And, as much as deep business experience enables an IP consultant to fully appreciate the needs of a business client, to fully appreciate the needs of an inventor, an IP consultant must oneself be an inventor. Mr. Kong is an inventor. He has invented software and business methods associated with the efficient analysis and management of intellectual property. He is currently the named inventor in a couple of United States patent applications. He has been a primary speaker at events sponsored by China PTO (SIPO), Taiwan PTO (TIPO), Industrial Technology Information Industries (ITRI), Singapore PTO (IPOS) and others.”


Articles By This Author

Dispatches from the Salt Mines

The name Salzburg literally means "Salt Castle", and derives its name from the barges carrying salt on the Salzach river, which were subject to a toll in the 8th century, as was customary for many communities and cities on European rivers.

I've been sent here, near the salt mines of Austria, to represent IP.com Inc., as Executive Vice President and Head of Asia Pacific, at the Salzburg Global Seminar, which I'm privileged to co-chair this year.

New Models of Intellectual Property: Predictability and Openness as Spurs to Innovation, Session 460 of the Salzburg Global Seminar, begins today and continues through December 11th.

The session will convene senior legal and corporate experts, high-level government officials and leading academics and commentators from around the world to explore ideas on how countries can benefit from new paradigms of innovation and develop solutions to persistent global disputes relating to IP. The underlying question will be how to ensure that IPR are used to promote the widest possible benefits from innovation, and not restrict them.

It's a tough assignment, but somebody's got to do it. Johnson Kong, reporting from Salzburg, Austria.

IP5 Announces International Work-sharing

As we head off to Asia next week, commencing our trip in Korea for PATINEX 2008, we're mindful of the recent meeting of the IP5.

The heads of five intellectual property offices (IP5) met to address the common challenges they are currently facing. The meeting was held at Jeju, Korea, on October 27 and 28, 2008, and chaired by Dr. Jung-Sik Koh, Commissioner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO).

The other heads of the IP5 offices were Ms Alison Brimelow, President of the European Patent Office (EPO); Mr Takashi Suzuki, Commissioner of the Japan Patent Office (JPO); Mr Tian Lipu, Commissioner of the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China (SIPO), and Mr Jon Dudas, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

They announced the adoption of the vision statement of work-sharing initiative among the five offices: "The elimination of unnecessary duplication of work among the offices, enhancement of patent examination efficiency and quality, and guarantee of the stability of patent right ". The offices also elaborated a cooperative framework in the form of ten Foundation Projects. These projects were devised to harmonize the search and examination environment of each office and to standardize the information-sharing process. The projects are expected to facilitate the work-sharing initiative by enhancing the quality of patent searches and examinations and building mutual trust in each other's work.

As the world sees economic barriers between nations fade away, innovators want their intellectual creations protected concurrently in major markets. Hence, applications for the same technology are filed at more than one patent office.

The heads of the five offices recognize the trend toward greater globalization and seek to minimize the resultant redundancy of patent searches and examinations. They also share a concern for the growing number of pending patent applications and the prolonged pendency period; and they acknowledge that delays in granting patents hinder the promotion of innovation, which is an intrinsic function of the patent system. To tackle this global phenomenon in an efficient manner, the IP5 offices have agreed to collaborate in moving forward with a work-sharing initiative.

Each office will oversee the implementation of two Foundation Projects. For the first step, the offices agreed that by, at the latest, the end of April 2009 they would exchange detailed proposals on each Foundation Project and strive to identify the areas of agreement as well as specific details of implementation.

The benefits of work-sharing are expected to be tangible and substantial. The number of applications filed at two or more of the IP5 offices currently stands at up to 250,000 per year. Reutilisation of the work of another office for these duplicate applications can lead to significant improvements in patent examination efficiency for all the IP5 offices.

The work-sharing among the five offices will increase the efficiency of the patent system and minimize the cost and effort of patent applicants with regard to the acquisition and management of patent rights. Consistency in the patent process will ensure the predictability of patent results when applicants lodge applications at multiple offices. Greater simplicity will increase the convenience and savings of applicants.

At the close of the meeting, the offices pledged to continue working together toward the realization of the shared vision and agreed to convene the next Heads of the five offices meeting at a time convenient to each office in 2009.

The lead offices and their assigned Foundation Projects are as follows:

  1. Common Documentation Database (lead: EPO) - Aim: To bring together a common set of relevant patent and nonpatent literature from around the world to assist patent examiners in their prior art searches
  2. Common Approach for a Hybrid Classification (lead: EPO) - Aim: To enable joint and efficient updating of patent classification and facilitate the reuse of work among the patent offices
  3. Common Application Format (lead: JPO) - Aim: To facilitate the filing procedure of each office by using a Common Application Format; and by using electronic or digitized patent application filing (in XML format) and subsequent processing and publication in XML format
  4. Common Access to Search and Examination Results (lead: JPO) - Aim: To enable examiners to find one-stop references in the dossier information of other offices, such as search and examination results and to conduct the priority document exchange (PDX) to reduce the cost of ordering copies of priority documents for applicants and the administrative costs of electronic processing for offices
  5. Common Training Policy (lead: KIPO) - Aim: To standardize the training of patent examiners at each office, helping examiners to produce equivalent results of search and examination at the five offices
  6. Mutual Machine Translation (lead: KIPO) - Aim: To help the offices overcome the language barrier of patent information and allow greater access to each other’s patent information
  7. Common Rules for Examination Practice and Quality Control (lead: SIPO) - Aim: To execute patent examinations at a similar standard and quality through common rules of examination practice and quality control
  8. Common Statistical Parameter System for Examination (lead: SIPO) - Aim: To establish a system of common statistical parameters for all examinations at the five offices; and to conduct statistical tasks and exchange information on examination practices under common rules and parameters, building on the work of the Trilateral statistical working group
  9. Common Approach to Sharing and Documenting Search Strategies (lead: USPTO) - Aim: To promote reutilization by enabling the patent examiners of each office to understand each other’s search strategy
  10. Common Search and Examination Support Tools (lead: USPTO) - Aim: To establish a system of common search and examination tools to facilitate work-sharing

Older Entries