<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Cadillac - Securing Innovation</title>
<link>http://www.securinginnovation.com/articles/trademarks/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:26:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:16:39 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>The Sequel: Can GM Reinvent Its Brand?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><object height="344" width="425">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zw7zA-RV5yE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
<param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed height="344" width="425" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Zw7zA-RV5yE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>  </p>
<blockquote>
<p>GM needs to cut costs, create stronger brand messages with the consumer, and make better cars. By marketing fewer models under few brands, they should be able to sell more cars than they do now. The plan they need to submit to Congress today is a simple and inevitable one.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.snarkhunting.com/2009/02/gm-goes-to-washington/">Look, here's the plan.</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.securinginnovation.com/2009/02/articles/trademarks/the-sequel-can-gm-reinvent-its-brand/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securinginnovation.com/2009/02/articles/trademarks/the-sequel-can-gm-reinvent-its-brand/</guid>
<category>Branding</category><category>Brands</category><category>Cadillac</category><category>Chevrolet</category><category>GM</category><category>Trademarks</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:26:56 -0500</pubDate>
<dc:creator>IP</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
