<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>publications - Securing Innovation</title>
<link>http://www.securinginnovation.com/articles/innovationq/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:32:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:11:24 -0500</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Watch For IP Leaks From Publications</title>
<description><![CDATA[Over the years  I've written dozens of technical articles, blogs,&nbsp;and marketing literature.&nbsp;  Most of what I wrote was reviewed by marketing, engineering, and perhaps  sales.&nbsp;My articles have been examined for&nbsp;their ability to carry&nbsp;the corporate  message, technical accuracy, and how the pieces positioned products. No one <em zid="32">ever</em> brought up the issue of intellectual property.  This is not something  unique to my experience.&nbsp;Companies worry about the content and form of  publications but not the IP that might be revealed in them.&nbsp;When someone does  catch some important IP heading out the door it is&nbsp;often by happenstance. It's  not so much that companies don't care. <br />
<br />
If you bring up the subject of &quot;IP in  publications&quot; most companies will sincerely tell you that they are worried about  it. Yet despite that,&nbsp;examining publications&nbsp;for IP is not always part of the normal  publication review process.  On the flip side are  the companies that are paranoid about IP in publications. For many, the&nbsp;knee  jerk reaction is &quot;publish nothing!&quot; This doesn't work for long  since&nbsp;publications are a major part of corporate communications. Are you  going&nbsp;to tell scientists that they can't publish a scientific paper? They won't  work for you. Just try and shut up an engineer with a good idea for an article.  You'll only infuriate him. Marketing has to publish white papers  and&nbsp;sales&nbsp;literature&nbsp;so you can't stop them from producing  publications.&nbsp;  <br />
<br />
The simple solution is  a publication clearance process, implemented as a workflow. The process of  Publication Clearance pushes the document in front of everyone who should see it  including legal counsel, patent counsel, technical and marketing. Publication  clearance within <a href="http://www.ip.com/innovationq/">InnovationQ</a> also protects the document as intellectual  property. It is subjected to the same <a href="https://priorart.ip.com/lsa/">LegalSafeguarding</a> process as documents in  the Trade Secret Management modules. We can even build hooks into docketing or  our Trade Secret Management modules to help better identify IP contained in  publications before it is too late.   <br />
<br />
Adopting a publication  clearance process is a good first step toward protecting important intellectual  property. Having tools to automate this process makes it much easier to live  with.]]></description>
<link>http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/03/articles/innovationq/watch-for-ip-leaks-from-publications/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securinginnovation.com/2008/03/articles/innovationq/watch-for-ip-leaks-from-publications/</guid>
<category>Innovation Management</category><category>InnovationQ</category><category>innovation</category><category>publications</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:32:55 -0500</pubDate>
<author>tpetrocelli@ip.com (Tom Petrocelli)</author>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>